Gleason & Associates logoExperience. Expertise. Results. masthead
Why GleasonPractice AreasMeet Our TeamCase StudiesContinuing EducationResourcesSite MapContact UsHome
Case Studies
ValuationForensic Accounting & Financial ReorganizationIntellectual PropertyLitigationEconomic LossAsbestos Trust Management

CASE STUDIES BY CATEGORY

Valuation

Forensic Accounting & Financial Reorganization

Intellectual Property

Litigation

Economic Loss

Asbestos Trust Management

No Harm, No Foul

It's not easy to tell your client that it doesn't have a case, but in this engagement, our analysis prompted the withdrawal of a law suit that saved the legal team and the company it represented from enlisting in a likely losing battle.

Engagement
After an acquisition soured, Gleason & Associates was retained by counsel for the acquiring company to analyze whether the seller's Big Four accounting firm had negligently issued an unqualified audit opinion on the company's financial statements. The charge was that the company had left its books open and recorded sales that actually occurred after year end in the current year.

Gleason's Role
Hired to analyze and provide an opinion on liability as well as damage issues, our analysis concentrated on four successive questions: How significant was the sales cutoff issue? Was the accounting firm's audit work deficient? Did the buyer rely on the audit opinion when evaluating the acquisition? What, if any, damages were incurred? Answers to these questions exposed potential problems with our client's case.

Results
Our review of the seller's financial records revealed that although the sales cutoff issue was significant, its books had habitually remained open past appropriate end-of-year cutoffs. Even though the seller's accounting firm had failed to identify the problem, the most recent year's financial results were not materially impacted by the extension of that year because the prior year's sales cutoff had been extended as well.

In addition, the accounting firm that the buyer had engaged to perform due diligence on the seller also failed to flag the cutoff issue.

It was not apparent in our analysis of the buyer's financial models that it had based its acquisition decision or purchase price on the seller's historical data.

The buyer's acquisition models did not reflect other financial concerns raised by its own accounting firm.

Based on the combination of these factors, we concluded that damages would be difficult to document and prove, even if liability could be established.


Why Gleason | Practice Areas | Meet Our Team | Case Studies | Continuing Education | Resources | Site Map | Contact Us | Home

© 2013 Gleason & Associates
One Gateway Center, Suite 525, 420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Pittsburgh, PA 15222, Phone: 412.391.9010,